🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's lawmakers have voted to pull out from an international accord designed to safeguard females from abuse, including family violence, following prolonged and heated discussions in the parliament.

Thousands of demonstrators gathered in the capital this past week to oppose the decision. The ultimate authority now lies with Head of State Edgars Rinkevics, who must decide whether to approve or veto the proposed law.

Known as the European treaty, the international accord only became active in Latvia last twelve months ago, requiring authorities to develop laws and assistance programs to eliminate all types of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the initial EU country to initiate the process of exiting from the treaty. The transcontinental nation pulled out in 2021, a move that human rights organizations characterized as a significant setback for women's rights.

Political Controversy and Resistance

The treaty was ratified by the European Union in last year, yet traditionalist factions have argued that its emphasis on gender equality weakens traditional families and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Latvian parliament, MPs decided 56 to 32 to exit from the treaty, a move sponsored by opposition parties but backed by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The result represents a setback for centre-right Prime Minister Evika Silina, who stood with protesters outside parliament earlier this seven-day period. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that violence does not triumph," she stated to the assembly.

Political Disagreements and Reactions

One of the primary political groups supporting the exit is a nationalist party, whose head has urged the public to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

The nation's human rights commissioner the rights official appealed for the agreement not to be politicized, while the group Equality Now stated it was "not a threat to national principles, it served as a tool to realize them".

The recent decision has sparked widespread outcry both inside the country and abroad.

22,000 individuals have endorsed a Latvian appeal demanding the treaty to be maintained. The women's rights organization the rights center has announced a demonstration for the coming week, accusing MPs of ignoring the wishes of the nation's citizens.

International Worries and Potential Future Actions

The head of the Council of Europe's legislative body commented that the Baltic state had made a hasty decision driven by misinformation. He described it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning step backward for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in the continent".

He added that since the transcontinental nation left the convention four years ago, cases of gender-based killings and abuse targeting females had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not secure a supermajority majority, the head of state could possibly return the bill for additional consideration if he has objections.

Head of State the national leader stated on digital platforms that he would assess the vote according to constitutional principles, "taking into account state and legal considerations, instead of ideological or political viewpoints".

Recently, another member of the ruling coalition, the reformist party, indicated it would not rule out appealing to the supreme judicial body.

"This vote represents a concerning situation for gender equality not only in Latvia but across Europe," commented a rights activist.

• Family violence statistics have been increasing in several European nations
• The Istanbul Convention mandates particular legal protections for victims of gender-based violence
• The nation's decision could affect comparable discussions in other EU countries